Blog

  • Russian Expansion Strategy: Active Measures and Nukes

    Russian Expansion Strategy: Active Measures and Nukes

    In May, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko said this to Russian TV audiences, per Reuters: “No one is against Kazakhstan and other countries having the same close relations that we have with the Russian Federation,” Lukashenko said. “If someone is worried … (then) it is very simple: join in the Union State of Belarus and Russia. That’s all: there will be nuclear weapons for everyone.”

    Lukashenko, a people-pleaser when it comes to Putin, revealed where Putin’s foreign policy strategy and active measures come together. Putin bids autocrats, dictators, and their favored elites to preserve their power by obtaining nuclear arms as vassal states under a new Soviet Union based on slavic-nationalism.

    Implied but not publicized is that the Russian military and mercenaries would come into member countries to guard the nukes, monopolize defense, and effectively control each member nation.

    Putin has entangled Russia in an unnecessary war of aggression on neighboring Ukraine and has used Lukashenko to cry for help as Putin’s self-imposed disaster careens toward catastrophe after his forces (1) destroyed the dam once insuring water supply to one of the most productive breadbaskets of the Eastern hemisphere, and (2) rigged a massive nuclear power plant in the same region with explosives, threatening to irradiate Ukraine’s hemispheric food supply center. What sane leader would sign onto that?

    Neither Russian-managed Chernobyl nor a security state economy with an expanding nuclear arsenal worked very well for former Soviet states and their neighbors. And good faith security guarantees from Moscow? Ask Ukraine and Moldova about those.

    This is why, asked for comment, Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev referred to Kazakhstan’s economic treaty with Russia as quite enough, then said, “As for nuclear weapons, we do not need them because we have joined the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.”

    The world saw the end of one dictatorial doomsday union. Does it need another?

    Meanwhile free nations see record immigration from countries run by self-centered autocrats. That is testimony to the wisdom of crowds.

     

     

     

  • View: Autocratic model trips on its own red carpet

    View: Autocratic model trips on its own red carpet

    Mr. Khrushchev said, “We will bury you”
    I don’t subscribe to this point of view…

    -Sting


    Xi Jinping has spent tens of billions promoting autocracy as the new, responsible leadership model. Yet Putin’s Russia, North Korea, Iran, Syria, and others have shown the world that autocracy is as outdated and hazardous as lead paint.


    Top-down regimes cannot nurture creative, competitive innovation because the rule of few or one stifles their people’s freedom, creativity, incentive, and dreams. Autocrats make so many enemies that allowing freedom is a threat not only to their power but to their own special treatment, freedom, and luxury.


    When you get past the nationalist or socialist baggage, autocracy becomes parasitic plutocracy plying varied rationalizations for the people’s supposed “need” for the rulers. They often devolve into personality cults combining nationalism and religion to hook gullible people and recruit extremists to help them rule by fear. And the bad decisions just keep coming from the dictators’ club.


    For Russia, the invasion of Ukraine was a bad decision driven by autocratic fear of lost control that has led to lost control. And the bad decisions got worse, namely: (1) the decision to blow the Kakhovka Dam, imperiling one of the Eastern Hemisphere’s most important agricultural food baskets; and (2) the order to rig the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Station in Ukraine with explosives, which could bring long term contamination of the surrounding, agriculturally rich region.


    None of this recommends Xi Jinping’s argument that autocratic rule is the wave of the future as he forces others in China to support Putin’s regime. I don’t subscribe to his point of view.

  • Assessing Russia’s Ruling Convolutions

    Assessing Russia’s Ruling Convolutions

    Perspective: In an insightful 2016 paper, “A Little Masquerade: Russia’s Evolving Employment of Maskirovka,” Major Morgan Maier, United States Army, wrote:

    “Russia uses maskirovka to conceal military and political activities, as well as engage in clandestine military operations. The Russian military and political apparatus see deception as an indispensable component of war, warfare, and operational art.”

    Ask: From this perspective, what Russian political and military objectives might have been hidden, achieved or defeated by the Wagner Group’s June 24th occupation of Rostov-on-Don, aggressive drive toward Moscow, and Wagner leader Yevgeny Prigozhin’s reversal and presumed exile to Belarus?

    Discussion: The convolutions of words and actions by Yevgeny Prigozhin, Wagner Group, Kadyrovites, President Vladimir Putin, Moscow’s Prosecutor, the FSB, and Alexander Lukashenko on and since June 24th have had the effect of creating chaos, fog, dichotomies, and triangulations for all to decipher. There were no public words of denial, decision, or assertion from Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu or Chief of Staff Valery Gerasimov during these events, and few active duty military spoke-up about it.

    Prigozhin had significant momentum and sympathy for his short-lived crusade evidenced by so little resistance from regular military, national guard, and police forces along the way. Then all at once, Prigozhin stood down. He and Putin were silent for about a day until Prigozhin explained that he reversed his Moscow march to avoid shedding Russian blood and because his goal was “protest” not “regime change.” This, after threats to go all the way against the corrupt Russian MOD.  He added that many Russians were disappointed Wagner Group had stopped its drive toward Moscow “because, apart from the struggle for our existence, they saw in the march of justice the support in the fight against bureaucracy and other ailments that afflict our country.” The explanation rang hollow for some who believed he would champion a righteous cause. (Recent history is instructive: Yevgeny Prigozhin was well known for crimes of moral turpitude, cooking-up government food, and running the “Internet Research Agency” before appearing (supposedly at the front) with Wagner mercenaries for photo-ops. Internet Research Agency was an online and offline active measures, maskirovka machine.)

    On anti-bureaucratic talk, compare twelve days earlier President Putin’s meeting with Russian military bloggers on June 13, 2023 in which he blamed the MOD bureaucracy for failing to promote younger, combat experienced talent to command Russian military units. Here, Putin mirrored Prigozhin’s blame for the MOD bureaucracy in answering the mil bloggers’ questions, but only as a convenient excuse for himself. Prigozhin appeared to make corruption in the Russian MOD a recurring theme in his demand for change, yet dropped out in the end even as Putin purges those Prigozhin inspired to sympathy with his cause.

    Yet Putin had earlier this year catered to the MOD bureaucracy, promoting Chief of Staff Gerasimov over General Sergei Surovikin for command over the Ukraine war, and favoring those that Wagner chief Prigozhin rhetorically despised. Putin allowed the harsh anti-MOD rhetoric from Prigozhin while giving the MOD more latitude and credit, utilizing a divide-and-conquer approach to keeping the fire out from under his own feet over Ukraine. He nurtured conditions for a clash.

    Prigozhin’s bottom line in recent days appears to have been to support Putin’s rule while yet attacking the MOD bureaucracy under Putin’s watch, putting it in the crosshairs of the public and military rank and file, yet then withdrew from his own crusade he initiated on a false pretext. Such contradictions put enigma wrapping on Russian state intrigue for the outside world.

    In an apparent face saving attempt after the Wagner “justice march” made him look weak, Putin dramatically honored military and police for stopping “civil war” from breaking out in Russia  while the FSB dropped a criminal case against Prigozhin because his forces had ceased “criminal activities.” Yet Putin apparently implied that charges for stealing would be brought against Prigozhin if warranted even as Lukashenko told the press that there were security guarantees for Prigozhin in Belarus.

    And it appears that within the past 24-48 hours there are reports of Prigozhin reportedly flying to Moscow to work out the terms of his negotiated relationship to Russia and Belarus even as Putin began purging the military of those sympathetic to Prigozhin’s aborted march for justice. Wagnerites appeared to cry foul online over Prigozhin’s fight and flight as a betrayal, but whether all were Wagner posting on Telegram is also uncertain. And so Prigozhin’s march of justice started looking like an exercise to draw out those who would not remain loyal to Putin and his silovarch-run regime as the Ukraine adventure soured.

    If, in a fit of Stalinesque paranoia, Putin undertook an operation using Prigozhin as a tool of deception to ensnare traitors and execute purges, Putin will have learned from it how unenthusiastic Russians were about protecting him as Wagner Group closed in on Moscow. Such an operation would also reveal how weak, selfish, and ignoble Putin has become, flailing away at those around him. By preemptive betrayal he distrusted the fear that he in part instilled in them. Tangled webs, paranoia, and dictatorship trend in maskirovka to hide the corruption and degradation of the ruler drunk on power.

    The Russian military blogger FighterBomber reportedly blasted Putin’s moves on his popular Telegram Channel without naming him, writing that: “The main gratitude and the direct responsibility of the state toward pilots who fulfilled their duty and sacrificed their lives to save the Motherland would be the inevitable and severe punishment of their murderers. In accordance with the laws of the Russian Federation.”

    Apparently, FighterBomber believed that Russian airmen had been killed by Wagner Group in the numbers stated, but it is not clear if he actually witnessed this firsthand. If FighterBomber’s followers and sources are reliable and his belief correct, the downing of seven Russian military aircraft and their crews followed by Putin’s Stalinist purges of the military are losses Ukraine’s leadership and supporting powers would want to publicize in detail.

    Meanwhile, recently uncorroborated reports of camp construction underway in Belarus to house Wagner Group mercenaries brought denials from Belarus President Lukashenko despite his acknowledgement of security guarantees for Prigozhin and musings that combat experienced Wagner Group mercenaries could usefully train Belarus forces. In that vein, Lukashenko also bid them, “set up your tents.” Lukashenko’s cryptic words coincided with Putin reiterating his promise to let Wagner mercenaries move to Belarus with their leader.

    For context, recall that early in Putin’s invasion of aggression against Ukraine in 2022, President Lukashenko had briefed his security council using a map showing plans of attack against Ukraine and Moldova from Belarus.

    Analysis: In a few days, positive and negative actions and communications by Russian decision makers have imposed dichotomies on nearly every event involving Wagner Group retreating from Ukraine and moving against Russia’s MOD since June 24th, generating uncertainty, ambiguity, and doubt as to the truth of these matters.

    Key dichotomies follow, with one forming triangulation:

    (1) Wagner in Ukraine was poorly supplied per Prigozhin, Wagner was paid billions by Moscow per Putin;

    (2) The Russian MOD attacked Wagner in Ukraine with rockets per Prigozhin, possibly pushing a false pretext, with the accusation denied by the Russian MOD;

    (3) Wagner was on a heavily armed justice march that would hold corrupt Russian military leaders to account per Prigozhin’s telegraphed resolve to go “all the way,” before he stood down outside of Moscow calling it only a protest;

    (4) Prigozhin was determined to save Russian troops from corrupt bureaucrats, then he was not;

    (5) Putin called Prigozhin a traitor, but then implied that he may only be a thief, or neither;

    (6) Prosecutors opened a case for treason against Prigozhin but then dropped it;

    (7) Wagner mercenaries were illegal and deniable in Russia but Putin admitted Moscow bankrolled them;

    (8) Putin promised that if Prigozhin and any member of Wagner Group would not pledge loyalty to Russia, Prigozhin and as many of Wagner Group fighters who wanted to could remove to Belarus after Wagner Group turned in its weapons to the Russian MOD at Rostov-on-Don;

    (9) In a seeming triangulation from these Putin-Prigozhin dichotomies, Belarus President Lukashenko suggested Wagner mercenaries could serve a useful combat training role in Belarus while denying reports that camps were being set up to house them. This, against the recent historical backdrop of Lukashenko’s early 2022 briefing of his security council on a mapped plan for Belarus to be a staging ground for Russian attacks on Ukraine and Moldova.

    (10) In a potentially related development, Yahoo News reported that Russia sent five Il-76 heavy air transport aircraft from Pskov, Russia to an airfield near Minsk, Belarus on June 24th and back again on the evening of June 25th, its source asserting that the transports saw no activity while at the airfield and were empty both ways “according to the information” the source had. The means, quality, and character of the information is difficult to assess by the report alone. Whether, as the report posited, Putin sent transports for Belarus forces on standby to fly in and help defend Moscow from a Wagner Group raid, or whether Russian military supplies and or personnel were flown into Belarus to coincide with Wagner Group’s arrival is uncertain. It is not clear from the Belaruski Hajun’s brief Telegram Channel report that the monitor could obtain firsthand verification that there was no cargo onboard the transports or that the planes had not stopped elsewhere on the way. Adding to the uncertainty is that the reported origin of the five Il-76s flying into Belarus on June 24 was the Pskov oblast near St. Petersburg, home of the 76th Guards Air Assault Division. The 76th is an all-volunteer, elite airborne division situated for rapid deployment with a storied Soviet war history, successful hybrid warfare in Crimea 2014, and evidence of violations of the laws of war protecting civilians in Russia’s second war against Chechnya and in the 2022 invasion of Ukraine in Bucha. The 76th Guards Air Assault Division had massed inside Belarus for Putin’s aggression against Ukraine. Its members may have a revenge motive for continuing the fight against Ukraine after reportedly losing most of its 237th Guards Airborne Assault Regiment during Ukraine’s counter-offensive in September 2022.

    (11) Prigozhin was reportedly exiled to Belarus and Wagner Group given three choices by Putin, however Prigozhin’s business jet has reportedly traveled to Moscow from Belarus in the past 48 hours with some speculation that Prigozhin had returned to Moscow to complete “negotiations” of the terms of his relationship to Russia, Belarus, and perhaps Wagner Group’s future in Belarus and elsewhere.

    A commonality between internet-based OSINT outlets in Belarus and Russia is that they are permitted to operate and report by their ruling regime and are at special risk for coercion and information spiking by their ruling regime security forces, adding uncertainty to their allowed output.

    None of this requires or rules out a finding that there is a pivoting, adapting maskirovka operation between Moscow, Yevgeny Prigozhin, and others. However, patterns of communications and actions playing out between Prigozhin, Putin, some in the MOD, Lukashenko, and others are creating dichotomies of uncertainty, ambiguity, and provocative bait for Western powers per the objectives of modern Russian use of maskirovka centrally controlled as operational art.

    It would be irresponsible not to consider that maskirovka for military deception purposes may be at work to create future surprise or advantage in the war with Ukraine even as advantages may be pressed with timely professional responses and precision. The patterns in conduct of the relevant Russian and Belarusian decision makers appears to fit the purposes and effects of maskirovka as used in Russia’s modern warfare as discussed below under “Objectives Achieved,” and subject to criticism with “Negative Outcomes Realized for Russia.”

    Restated Ask: By the confusion surrounding Wagner Group’s and Russian regime activities from June 24th on, what objectives have been hidden and achieved or negative outcomes realized by the Russian regime and Wagner Group?

    Objectives Achieved

    Russians have historically achieved objectives through chaos and ignominy that most people find hard to believe. Consider these possible objectives materializing through the Prigozhin mutiny event evolution:

    1. Time and Safe Passage to Pivot: Intentionally or not, Prigozhin / Wagner Group and Vladimir Putin each bought or received windfalls of time when Prigozhin telegraphed Wagner’s move against the MOD in Rostov-on-Don and “march of justice” on Moscow. (This likely helped Wagner with safe passage and relocation out of Ukraine following Prigozhin’s telegraphs and tip-offs to the West, an observation made by commentator Eric Udouj on LinkedIn). Wagner’s vigor and good condition on entering Rostov-on-Don and in blitzing toward Moscow supports the safe passage point yet also casts doubt on Prigozhin’s pretext for action, that the Russian MOD attacked his mercenaries with rockets. For Wagner Group, Prigozhin’s deception could lead to military survival escaping Ukraine’s counter-offensive, and future military advantage by redeployment. For Putin the gains are political: Putin gained time away from military and public scrutiny and blame for the failing war on Ukraine when Prigozhin played the wild card threat and intrigue-object up to present day.
    2. Fear Created Opportunity: As worked in the 1990s, Putin would likely resort to a playbook that elevated him in to the Presidency by New Years, 2000. As Putin used Yeltsin’s incapacity to sell himself, so with Prigozhin Putin could stoke Russians’ fear of chaos and civil war to keep power. Prigozhin’s fury at the Russian military leadership and bureaucracy helped Putin appear the more reasonable alpha. Yet Prigozhin, by standing down and submitting himself to Putin’s deal, enabled Putin to appear to stare down the rider of the apocalypse and save Russians from chaos, acting executively to purge the government and military thereafter. This allowed Putin to masquerade as both protector and master of Prigozhin, the Russian military command, and the Russian people by working them all against each other, then coming to their respective rescue from the chaos Putin caused in the first place.
    3. Scapegoats: Prigozhin made scapegoats of “bureaucrats” of the Russian Defense Ministry, military officers, intelligence heads, and perhaps other governing officials to the Russian people, military rank and file, and veterans for what has gone wrong in the Ukraine war, which was a diversion from Putin’s central responsibility for the Ukraine aggression.
    4. Patriot Appeal: Both Putin and Prigozhin appealed to nationalistic symbols of patriotism to win followings from mil bloggers and patriots. For Prigozhin it was in ostensibly caring about the troops poorly commanded by bureaucrats and incompetents. For Putin it was using his dear leader pulpit to personally thank military, national guard, and police forces for their service in averting chaos and civil war when the actually did not, making them heroes in the eyes of Russians who fear chaos more than foreign wars. There were few signs of serious will to protect Putin in Wagner Group’s easy occupation of Rostov and blitz toward Moscow.
    5. The Reassignment of Wagner Group to Belarus: If reports are true that Wagner Group will regroup in Belarus with their leader Prigozhin, it could be an effort to renew attack vectors and missions against Ukraine and eventually, the Baltics from inside Belarus.
    6. Deeper Cooptation of Belarus: With Wagner Group adhering to Belarus by Putin’s authority and Lukashenko’s acceptance of Putin’s edict ‘exiling’ Prigozhin and company to Belarus, this further coopts Belarus in common peril with Russia after Belarus’ reception of Russian nuclear missiles.
    7. Fog and Confusion: Fog and confusion caused by Russian leadership in Russia can be claimed as a governing talent or asset to counterbalance criticism of the regime for its costly failures in Ukraine if the leaders have a preplanned antidote for it, for example appearing to be on top of things by purging scapegoats for the “special military operation” gone bad, recently adding Prigozhin to the list of those maligned yet continuing to use him at the same time. The image of Donald Trump continuously throwing people under the bus to stay in a limousine comes to mind, with each new victim the latest scapegoat-antidote to public doubt in the dear leader yet the dear leader still plays hot and cold with scapegoats (Lt. Gen. Flynn). If the antidote appears to relieve the people from the believed fear and chaos it may be praised depending on ultimate outcomes. Confusion, fear, and chaos beg order, and it seems easier for many to accept the existing dictator than to risk worse with another that might start a civil war. This is likely why Putin invoked the term “civil war” in praising military and police for stopping Prigozhin’s march that Putin himself provoked by working the MOD and Prigozhin against one another for some time.
    8. Controlling Enemy Responses / Reflexive Control: Weakness at Home Produces Scapegoats Abroad to the Fearful Russian Public: The chaos caused by Prigozhin and Putin this past week has opened windows to real desperation and weaknesses in Putin’s Russia by making a short show of a real or supposed breached unity among men that Russians had deemed alpha leaders. Yet more desperate, Putin leveraged the specter of civil war to deepen his peoples’ fear of chaos and loss. And here is where reflexive control comes into the picture: At the show of weakness, Western voices of authority and opinion responded to Prigozhin’s coup feint by calling out Russia’s weakness across many media. By the West’s criticisms of Russian weakness Russian leadership may try to drum-up unity in a siege mentality among Russians. Would it be easy, or an uphill battle? The siloviki will cynically bet the Russian people would go with their bad alpha leader over self-righteous, judgmental outsiders. In the West, the right touch in telling the sad truth about Russian leadership during Russia’s self-created crisis is key.Voices of experience who know, appreciate, and even love Russia and Russians while yet faithfully and intelligently serving freedom over time could include Retired U.S. Army Brigadier General Peter Zwack and long serving intelligence veteran and statesman executive, Robert M. Gates.

    Negative Outcomes Realized for Russia

    Maskirovka, planned or executed on the fly during tumultuous events largely set in motion (in Russia’s case by the decisions of its leadership) can be clever, mind-boggling, and vexing for analysts yet does not always work well. It can and does create cascading, ongoing problems of entanglement in its own webs of deceit observed in Sir Walter Scott’s epic poem Marmion. Here are some negative outcomes, real and potential applying to Russia:

    1. Firehose or Snowmaker of Falsehood: After 23 years of Putin’s siloviki-heavy regime control, a RAND editor’s famous title about Soviet-Russian active measures, “Firehose of Falsehood” aptly describes the volume of deceptive activity used on the Russian people and the world by a narrow-set of rigid, hardline KGB veterans adopting western PR methods to puff Putin’s brand and bury Russians under layers of snow jobs so heavy, the avalanche risk to their power inevitably spikes. As the veils of deception fall, the Russian people see and feel the resulting, growing problems. And high volume deception, like drug addiction, breaks down credibility, trust, and human motivation to serve, undermining the regime employing the deceptions they themselves cling to out of desperation when lies are debunked by the plain truth the people inescapably live in. This trends in regime self-destruction, and President Biden was correct to say what is happening in Russia is an internal matter for Russia. When a regime having made itself your enemy is destroying itself, step out of the way and keep the U.S. out of Moscow’s toolbox for finding external scapegoats for its sins.
    2. Maskirovka Overused: Maskirovka, “a little masquerade” when employed in strategic and tactical military situations within just wars of defense as Ukraine is fighting, can be effective. And, as victory ends the need for more deception, it self-expires after its just purpose is met. However, used as a larger tool of the state over time, maskirovka can become a self-destructive weapon punctuated by occasional brutality rulers find necessary when they become impatient with the delusions and fear they themselves have nurtured in the people that they suddenly need to solve the errors and problems the dictator gets the state into. As such problems of sclerotic delusion ushered in the Soviet collapse Mikhail Gorbachev illuminated them in an attempt at liberalizing Russia with his glasnost and perestroika programs.
    3. The Ukraine War as Anvil: Through Putin’s dictatorial arrogance and hubris employing layer after layer of falsehood, he and his entourage got lost in the masquerade with self-deception and delusion leading him to cast Russia and Russians down on a hot burning anvil that is the war of against Ukraine. This error is so large, its effects are impossible to hide. The war in Ukraine is too heavy not to drag the Putin regime underwater, and once Russians know that the Putin regime is the cause of the threat of chaos that threatens to envelop them, what Prigozhin did will likely become a test-run for what is to come even if the ruling circle does not believe it. Russians will act to avoid living in chaotic confusion, loss, and existential misery, and Putin’s error in Ukraine was the one error that is pushing critical mass for regime change or revolution. 
    4. Russian Identity: By lies, falsehoods, pretenses, and half-truths strongman Vladimir Putin has adversely affected the Russian public’s memory of what it means to be qualitatively Russian, that is, the good Russians have to contribute to the world. By distorting Russia and Russians, the police-state product in the Kremlin has gone way past his depth, and it is likely that Russians will realize it during dark infighting episodes, related chaos, and a proliferation of crises.
    5. Chaos is Russians’ Red Line: The weight of Ukraine as a catastrophic decision imposed on Russians by Vladimir Putin will eventually cause breaks in Russian domestic life that threaten the return of chaos as bad or perhaps worse than that of the 1990s following the loss of the Soviet war in Afghanistan and the subsequent collapse of the Soviet Union. More maskirovka will not long be able to stave off what Putin has set in motion. Putin will be forced to become more and more draconian toward his own people to stay in power, which will only worsen his position because today’s Russians have higher expectations and greater external world awareness than those in Stalin’s time.

     

     

  • Reflection on Sacrifice: Trump’s Hatred for McCain, Mattis, and Kelly Tells Us Who Trump Served: Putin

    Reflection on Sacrifice: Trump’s Hatred for McCain, Mattis, and Kelly Tells Us Who Trump Served: Putin

    On this Memorial Day 2023, the nation should have a long memory of those who have faked their love, honor, and support for the members of our Armed Forces including for those who would or did give their last full measure of devotion. We owe our troops and our people the will to tell ourselves the truth about those who would preside.

    Senator John McCain pegged Putin for what he is, a KGB hardliner and apparatchik. Donald Trump savaged McCain, his service, and ultimately, his daughter for standing by the late Senator. This while praising Putin. The beneficiary? Putin.

    Secretary of Defense James Mattis did not flinch in flattening Wagner Group in Syria after being given discretion to defend U.S. troops. However when Mattis acted on that discretion and defended our troops from Russian aggression in Syria, Trump reversed his feigned respect for both Mattis and the troops, constructively ousting Mattis with “water cooler sniping” within weeks. This prompted Mattis to resign and signal why. Trump then betrayed Kurdish allies in Syria to an invasion and bombardment by Turkey’s Erdogan. The beneficiary was Putin, and increasingly by association, Xi Jinping, leveraging the lost influence Trump’s betrayal of Kurds in Syria would cause the United States. Two years later, Trump did it again, deliberately paving the way to a similar hell for America’s Afghan allies and friends, again, negotiating with their enemies and excluding them from the table.

    Retired Marine General and Chief of Staff John Kelly endured Trump’s questioning of his son’s (Lt. Robert Kelly) sacrifice in Afghanistan while at Arlington and Trump’s frightening use of the Presidency to incite divisive, destructive conflict not only within his administration but in U.S. government and American society. Trump had dismissed Kelly and tried to destroy his reputation by saying he couldn’t handle the pressure of the Chief of Staff position, a falsehood.

    What Kelly could not abide by was Trump’s patriotic bankruptcy regarding the United States, and how Trump made him fear for the nation’s defense, security, and freedom from autocracy.

    Trump was a deep-seated threat to the nation’s defense, security, unity, and well being who revealed his hatred for combat veterans he himself appointed after they actually stood by the ideals he claimed to have appointed them for. Beneficiary: Putin.

  • The Earthquakes of Erdogan

    As an Economist headline editor put it recently, “Turkey sits at the crossroads of tectonic plates as well as civilisations.”  And when the 7.8 magnitude earthquake centered near Gaziantep, Turkey caused a confirmed death toll of 50,783 souls, it highlighted the risk of autocratic license, boasting, and related corner-cutting to the rule of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. This left many to wonder what President Erdogan had learned from Turkey’s well-documented history of powerful earthquakes by 2023.

    The December 26, 1939 Erzincan quake was estimated at 7.8 magnitude, just like the Gaziantep quake of 2023. It caused 32,700 deaths striking 3 minutes shy of midnight. The 1939 quake killed roughly 18,000 fewer Turks than the February 2023 quake. Turkey also suffered two big quakes at magnitude 7.5 in both 1943 and 1976. And these are only the quakes within the past 84 years. Turkey’s history of major quakes extends centuries into the past.


    Despite Turkey’s complex tectonics and seismic history, Erdogan in 2019 took credit for “building amnesties” as a political campaign plug for cheap housing. After the February 2023 earthquake, Mr. Erdogan tried to defend himself for his praise of building amnesties with the claim that 98 percent of the buildings destroyed in the February 2023 earthquake were built before 1999, i.e. before his rule. Yet Mr. Erdogan’s claim was refuted by Turkish engineering experts and satellite evidence.

    Perhaps worse, a February 26, 2019 Reuters report quoted Turkish engineers and builders warning that building amnesties could be lethal, with Cemal Gokce, the chairman of the Chamber of Civil Engineers saying they could turn Turkish cities into “graveyards.”

    And in 2011 when Mr. Erdogan was Prime Minister he accused municipalities, constructors and supervisors of murder for the death toll of 460 after a 7.2 magnitude earthquake in Eastern Turkey, according to the Independent:

    Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Turkey had not learned enough from past earthquakes. The 7.2 tremor on Sunday killed at least 460 people.

    “When we look at the wreckage, we see how the material used is of bad quality,” Mr Erdogan said. “We see that people pay the price for concrete that virtually turned to sand, or for weakened concrete blocks on the ground floors. Municipalities, constructors and supervisors should now see that their negligence amounts to murder.”

    He said: “Despite all previous disasters, we see that the appeals were not heeded.”

    And yet Mr. Erdogan politically adopted the building amnesties he decried as corruption eight years earlier. 

    The U.S. suffered an Earthquake of similar magnitude to Turkey’s February 6, 2023 earthquake in San Francisco’s 1906 earthquake and fire, causing 3,000 deaths and $524 million in then-property damage (inclusive of fire damage). Yet that was 1906, with some 47,000 fewer deaths than that suffered in Erdogan’s Turkey in 2023.

    The 1906 Frisco quake hit at 5:12 AM hour whereas Turkey 2023 quake hit at 4:17 AM, an hour and five minutes apart adjusted for time zones.

    After the 1906 quake, San Francisco was in a hurry to rebuild, leaving building codes unchanged. However, within 20 years, the strong Long Beach earthquake in 1933 would damage schoolhouses in California, leading to the Field and Riley Acts addressing unreinforced brick and concrete buildings. By this 2006 San Francisco Chronicle report, San Francisco had reinforced some 90 percent of its legacy buildings. The Chronicle has kept up the coverage of the issue since, and democracy rightly holds elected city officials to account.

    The comparison is not to throw stones, but to suggest that vertical federalism, constitutional government, democratic elections, and free presses present more competitive politics in which meritorious action stays relevant while autocrat PR and personality cult does not make the cut. Politically weakened, Mr. Erdogan is now contending with democratic elements reasserting themselves to hold him accountable at the polls in the coming runoff election for Turkey’s presidency.

    Finally, as Russia’s ‘unlimited’ partner China has used backroom diplomacy to bring Saudi Arabia and Iran together to aggrandize influence over the Middle East, this has put Turkey’s security and economic interests at risk. Turkey’s autonomy and power at the crossroads of Asia, the Mideast, and Europe is also at risk to Beijing’s powerful momentum and its Mideast neighbors’ ambitions.

    As China has clearly found the democratic West’s innovation and efficiencies worthy of imitation, acquisition, and theft, Turks may wish to consider how constitutional merit has greater gravity for getting results in innovation and governance compared with autocratic theft and dependence on bigger autocracies.

    The American response to the two major 1906 and 1933 California earthquakes in which the death toll was a fraction of that of Turkey’s 2023 Gaziantep quake is illustrative of freedom’s merit. The Western track record for maintaining a well-developed rule of law, free elections, federalism, and growth in civil rights that enhance competition and merit offers a better future for diplomatic, economic, and security alliances than autocracies can.

    China, like Russia in its over-concentration of power is already taking autocratic, authoritarian license infiltrating every region of the world and its oceans with its imperial, appetitive, and rigid presence.

  • To Kill Autocrat Parasitism, Break the Autocratic Spell Over its Hosts

    Prescription: By three key efforts parasitic autocracies can be removed: (1) honest diplomacy, psychological, and information operations with cyber-support that break the dictatorial spell over the host peoples wherever they are; (2) giving those physically battling the aggressive parasites a decisive, unfair advantage in eradicating the parasite; (3) aiding other prospective hosts with proofing their national immune systems against future infection.

    Explanation: Democracy is hated existentially by the autocrat because freedom anywhere on Earth shows-up autocrats’ parasitic power over their own sacrificial people. Autocracies also become parasitic on one another. Putin’s autocracy makes Russia a host of Beijing. Xi Jinping sinks Chinese wealth into the black hole that is the Siloviki-organized, criminal parasite nest in the government. That government also hosts and feeds fanatical nationalists ready to kneecap Xi Jinping once Putin is deposed. As such, autocracy is a self-defeating power structure if it cannot get new hosts.

    Putin’s self-claimed democracy is a dead scarecrow of law and freedom hollowed out by dictatorial fiat and top-heavy power, possessing and driving Russian men to battles those men know to be manufactured to keep the parasite alive and in control of Russia’s leadership brain chamber, the Kremlin. Except the Russian brain and intellect is not there — the brutal kingpin parasite is. Xi Jinping wishes to fill that roiling helm with his own parasite. A parasite within a parasite.

    Existing Resources Can Get Busy with the Cure: There may be needed resources, reforms, and capabilities to improve honest diplomacy, psychological, and information operations with cyber-support. However, these capabilities as currently funded can find new approaches by adapting resources in the employment of the well-understood OODA-loop.

  • China’s Interest in Saudi Arabian Investment in Iran

    China’s Interest in Saudi Arabian Investment in Iran

    China’s diplomatic aid mending Saudi-Iranian relations in the Middle East sees Saudi Arabia immediately offering investment in Iran in the name of Saudi Arabia’s self-interest in regional stability. Yet Saudi Arabia’s investment in Iran would bolster the Iranian regime’s capability to perpetuate repression of its own people, continue as Russia’s chief overt weapons supplier, and prosecute its own arms buildup to remain Israel’s ongoing regional nemesis.

    Xi Jinping would entangle Western and Chinese cash flow for cheaply produced Saudi oil with indirectly financing Iran’s support for Putin’s nihilistic aggressions against Ukraine and other states. Beijing seeks western energy-economy cooptation by its Saudi-Iran peace coup, hoping it will weaken U.S. and allied resolve with respect to supporting free nations in the Eastern hemisphere, including Ukraine. Whether or not the U.S. weakens, Beijing and Russia will continue agitating isolationist strife in the United States to try to choke-off independent U.S. and allied free nation trade relationships, access, and control from within the U.S. political system.

    In the long game, Beijing would have the U.S. un-economically plunder and consume its domestic resources for a historically short-term surge in felt isolated power as lobbyist-bound Congress and domestic industries fail to invest in future energies, water, tech, and infrastructure. Beijing’s long game would see the U.S. become an isolationist, resource-spent shell of what it once was while the dictators’ club dominates world trade and efficient global and off-planet resource leverage.

    The personal power-corruption element in the dictators’ club should not be underestimated. Veiled beneath the positive talk of regional national interest, Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Muhammed bin Salman shares with Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong Un, Iran’s theocrats and the Assad regime of Syria a desire to get away with cowing, controlling, and terrorizing free nations into silencing themselves by killing expats residing in Western democracies abroad who live in, speak freely from, and prefer them to the dictatorships they left behind.

    Fear buttresses dictators’ murderous interference in the affairs of democracies: fear that their own people will come to desire freedom that the dictators do not intend to share given their statuses above the law, egoism, hubris, and entitlement. They know their people secretly resent their unjust abuses of power. One wonders whether Indian and Turkish leaders Narendra Modi and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan believe they can remain independent from such control, gazing as if into palantírs  gifted them by members of the dictators’ club.

    Finally, via the Saudi-Iran deal, Beijing and Moscow seek power over OPEC, insuring Beijing’s economic access to more affordable energy and bolstering Moscow’s control over markets tied to its chief economic resource. With such OPEC control, Europe, Nordic nations, the U.K., and Israel are increasingly encircled by a well-funded dictators’ club. Meanwhile, North America, Africa, and South America are increasingly isolated and exploited by the dictators’ club. Also, a viable Russian energy sector remains important for Beijing to exploiting and move Russia’s natural resources to China to work its global agenda.

    For the West, this puts a premium on forming new freedom nation organizations of collective action while using the U.N. Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombing to polymutually declare Wagner Group and other autocrat-loyal militant organizations as terrorist groups coercing OPEC and global mining nation governments with the continuous threat of ouster should they step out of line with the dictators’ club. A self-isolating U.S. would reinforce the dictators club policy and could find itself losing trade partners and security allies to Beijing and Moscow.

    And for Xi Jinping, arranging an economic support formula for Putin’s aggression against Ukraine not only throws a lifeline to Putin, but it sets a precedent Beijing covets in its claims to Taiwan. For Beijing it is “win-win” whether it succeeds in a peace deal between Kyiv and Moscow or with Putin’s devastation of a fellow slavic neighbor. Xi wishes to keep that precedent as an option for violence against the Chinese people living in Taiwan.

    Interesting point: the precedent setting in Ukraine for Taiwan would not matter so much unless it could be a basis for mutual dictatorial U.N. Security Council vetoes of any attempted U.N. action against such aggressions. In this, the U.N. becomes an instrument of tyranny over sovereignty of small nations at the behest of the big dictators’ club. At which point the dictators do what they moralistically condemned the West for having done via colonialism in the past.

    Three main free nation joint foreign policy goals will help maintain freedom and hedge against tyranny: (1) to assert free nation treaty action within the U.N. the enforcement of which treaties evades UNSC veto; and (2) to form a competing oil producing nation cartel with OPEC from among free nation producers of oil and gas while continuing to grow and leverage a free-nation oil purchasing cartel recently created; (3) to enhance, replace, or form new international economic blocs of free nations requiring as membership free nation status.

  • Advocation: Stand-Up “R4 Corps” Volunteer and Selective National Service

    Advocation: Stand-Up “R4 Corps” Volunteer and Selective National Service

    Advocation: The U.S. should stand up an “R4 Corps” as a rapid civilian defense, freedom, and security workforce adapting to the rising militancy of autocratic nuclear and proxy powers.

    The Mission

    “R4” could mean “Restore-Recycle, Retrofit, Remake, and Repurpose,” four activities applicable to all weapons, aircraft, drones, robots, munitions, vehicles, vessels, ships, boats, submarines, machines, equipment, gear, field supplies, surplus, found, captured, and other salvage materiel and materials… that DoD, civilian governments, companies, defunct companies, boneyards, salvage businesses, waste management, and recycle facilities would otherwise store, trash, or sell.

    1. Restore-Recycle: At this stage useful materiel, parts, and or materials are sorted for (A) Restoration to original or enhanced condition, or (B) Recycling (processing all components for later remaking into something else, whether by disassembly, crushing, melting-down, or other means).

    2. Retrofit: Items in relatively good condition with missing parts would be restored and have missing parts remanufactured in the Remaking phase, or, have new parts with enhanced capabilities and qualities made to fit.

    3. Remake: Remaking would mean either remaking quality engineered items, or, taking recycled and restored components and innovating, making something entirely new.

    4. Repurposing: In this phase, restored, retrofitted, remade, and innovated items would be evaluated for broad spectrum usefulness as-is, and/or new modifications innovated accordingly.

    5. The Implied R Considered at all Stages: What items could safely, reliably have a Robotic mode? Those that can, tweak accordingly.

    Personal Renewal Element for the People of R4 Corps

    The R4 Corps could have several human resource pathways: (1) match skilled volunteers with the right KSAs with existing defense industry employers expanding production; (2) train and place volunteers with aptitude for same into training with contractors or civil service; (3) open up local shops, garages, and warehouses around the United States to host R4 process with any and all materiel available, acquirable, and that logistically makes sense for that location. With recent surges in veterans transitioning to civilian life and tech layoffs, there may be just the right mixture of hirable talent for leadership, management, and technological expertise to help stand up these R4 workspaces; (4) incorporate the defense innovation community into the R4 Corps community by providing them with innovation sites at which to prototype concepts and move them to testable form; (5) have a dugout-program for innovators in various stages of research, trial and error as there are hidden resources in same; (6) hire or draft unemployed Americans into an R4 Corps training program addressing any and all reasonably remediable deficits, health issues, and basic needs that have gone unmet for said persons as a part of the recruiting and training process to bring out the value in Americans as yet unready to be part of R4 Corps. For those without matching skills, aspects of materiel cleaning, sorting, recycling, prepping, and organizing might be good beginning mission tasks for those whose demonstrated stability and basically trained ability make them ready to work.

    Whole of Society: An R4 Corps would answer the spirit of the many calls for whole of society solutions benefitting national defense, security, and freedom for the U.S. and allies. Civilian workforce renewal and civilian technology spinoffs would be deliberately anticipated core derivative benefits within and in the R4 civilian national service. For instance, An R4 Corps could also be an incubator for future innovators who ideate standalone or augmenting innovations from their R4 experiences.

    Research: R4 Corps could have a newly cleared research group blending veterans and civilians qualified to pore over old concepts and designs, put-off or never used by the Department of Defense that advancements in materials, know-how, and tech might bring to life.

    Benefits: R4 Corps members could volunteer for training and obtain public service education loan relief, new KSAs, room and board benefits, medical benefits, reasonable pay, and or be drafted-in with similar and future educational options. All R4 Corps members would take an oath to support and defend the U.S. Constitution akin to the military service member’s oath, and would be heavily encouraged and supported toward continuous education and training.

    Innovation Incentives: All whose part or whole original ideas or inventions within the R4 Corps that reach production or outsourcing would enjoy as a benefit the right to retain a part royalty from their intellectual contributions to new innovations, and the R4 Corps would retain a part royalty for having supported the means and environment for innovation, while licensee manufacturers would take part royalty in addition to profits from sales. The methods, recordation, and settlement of IP rights as benefits would be required for R4 service leadership and management to honor in consultation with the USPTO serving as an advisor, instructor, and aid to the R4 Corps’ innovation incentives mission.

    R4 Corps stations or details would all have creative time and license to innovate new items, designs, or upgraded, changed materiel from the top priority production directives as such would arise in the course of their priority projects.

    Demographic Considerations: There is a large population of Americans, including far too many disconnected men, who could help with many aspects of finding, processing, preparing, renewing, remaking, retrofitting, repurposing and inventing spinoffs from old technologies and materials in an R4 Corps.

    Public Provision, Initiatives, and Private Partnerships: The Defense Department, with congressional authorization and funding could organize and launch the civilian R4 Corps, hiring interested, qualified veterans into leadership and management positions across America’s states and localities while identifying first priority needs for the R4 Corps in its early weeks and identifying locational resources and logistical efficiencies to incorporate into planning and standing-up the R4 Corps.

    Congress and state legislatures could reallocate funding and expertise from existing job training, welfare-to-work, and needs-meeting government missions whose workloads may decrease with more people entering the R4 Corps as a solid opportunistic, funded pathway for those able to find purpose and do the work in the program.

    Real Estate Element: The R4 Corps could be a “whole of society” corps with Americans on local levels with public-private efforts to establish sufficient garage, hangar, storage, supply, plant, machining, tool, and technical access to customize old materiel for today’s free nation defense, deterrence, and dual-use needs. The proper packages of tax-incentives and lease compensation for property owners and materiel supporters of the R4 Corps should be a policy priority, especially as real estate bubbles and virtual work tax commercial real estate space and landlords suffer increasing defaults.

    Volunteer and Selective National Service for Broader Age Groups: An R4 Corps could have a volunteer element and a national selective service element drawing from a broader range of demographics to help put the right skills behind R4.

    In 2017 Gallup found that half of Americans favored mandatory national service. In 2021, Americorps cited a TargetPoint Consulting and GQR opinion poll among 18-24 year olds, reporting:

    Public opinion polling of 1,000 18–24 year old adults found near universal support for expanding national service opportunities through AmeriCorps (81%), and a great majority of them (71%) would consider serving in AmeriCorps. In overwhelming numbers, young people believe national service can be part of one’s civic duty (87%), help them solve problems in their communities (86%), and enable them to gain real world experience before entering an uncertain job market (85%).

    In January 2023 the Census Bureau cited the 2021 Volunteering and Civic Life in America research finding that “51% of the U.S. population age 16 and over, or 124.7 million people, informally helped their neighbors between September 2020 and 2021 at the height of the pandemic, according to the latest” and that “more than 23% of people in that age group, or 60.7 million, said they formally volunteered through an organization during the same period.”

    As fewer young Americans volunteer and or are fit for military service, rehabilitation to fitness, needed automation, and new industrial ingenuity making and supplying useful technologies and the right equipment, supplies, and weaponry to U.S. and friendly forces may present opportunities for a segment of this population.

    R4 Corps could also be a part solution to the lost purpose and identity issues underlying temporary mental and physical fitness problems, isolation, suicide, and a pathway to military service for some and full civilian employment or new business.

    R4 Corps pathways to military service could also bring more innovation minded recruits into the services as the Armed Services obtain more means to innovate on the fly with custom-maker technologies and as the Department of Defense funds same.

    For defense and free nation stand-up power, this is one way to make non-lethal solutions and lethality out of lemons. Regarding civilian spin-offs with dual use, R4 Corps could help put non-lethal creations into defense, deterrence, gray war, and future civilian service. U.S. military veterans are important members of our society and resources to our society that can continue serving if they like within the R4 Corps as one path of transition from military to civilian life while helping train, teach, and connect with civilians who will benefit from their experience to make the R4 Corps operations excellent.

    The Looming Need

    The United States and free nations need more minds making them more capable of stopping autocratic regimes, terrorist groups, and illicit cartels while reducing collateral damage to those whose freedom, hearts, minds, and well-being free nations would champion. This, while renewing the country from within in the process. If as former Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld related accurately, weakness is provocative to adversaries, internal strength building is crucial now.

    R4 Corps could be a powerful means to repurposing, renewing, and inspiring young and older Americans with a new meaning and purpose in their lives, with the R4 mission a means and a metaphor for their personal return to human and physical connection, purpose, and mission.

    There is some inexact precedent for the R4 Corps idea in many FDR-era civilian service opportunities such as the Civil Public Service Program, civilian defense councils under the Office of Civilian Defense, and in civilian defense production professions. And by restudying the benefits derived from the WW2 programs, Congress can help adapt to the need to deter a WW3 through leadership in thorough preparation of all-hands as rising great / super power dictatorships set their sites at bringing down free nation standing and sovereignty in the world.

    Strengthening the civilian bond to participation in national defense, freedom, and security is a public priority. The “R4 Corps” could be both a deterrent and active defense asset for the United States.

  • Tackling a Big History Lie Fueling Putin’s Xi-Jinping-Aided Aggression

    Tackling a Big History Lie Fueling Putin’s Xi-Jinping-Aided Aggression

    Despite Beijing’s global posturing in support of national sovereignty it uses sleight of hand to export “dual use” technology (civilian and military) to supply Putin’s war of aggression against Ukraine’s sovereignty. Yet Ukraine’s sovereignty is a matter of widespread international recognition.


    China’s strategy seems simple: tax Ukraine and the West to the point that it will be deemed too expensive to defend Taiwan if Xi decides to wage war against it. China wants to make Taiwan too expensive for the world to care about.


    However, Taiwan is too expensive for all nations depending on free eastern trade to abandon as a self-governing ally and trade partner, if, as Beijing’s own dual military-civilian asset buildup implies, Taiwan and Hong Kong will be used to expand Beijing’s militant stranglehold over all oceanic approaches to the East, thus subjugating the Western Pacific. The last time that happened was WW2.


    This brings into relief what China (and Russia) mean by “pole” and “multipolar” as declared and evolved in 1991 within the Shanghai Five group, now the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). In China’s conduct, not words only, how big does Beijing plan for China’s “pole” of power to be? Does it involve coopting a weakened Russia? If so, Yeltsin’s and Putin’s solicitous weakness before China’s power via the SCO charter suggests this is already happening.


    What else would China claim? The Koreas? Bhutan? Disputed border areas with India? Nepal? The Philippines? What is Xi Jinping’s appetite for control and conquest? By its massive PLA Navy expansion and global fishing fleets over-fishing the world’s international waters, Xi’s imperialism appears quite committed. Ideologically tied to Mao, who starved tens of millions of Chinese for doctrinaire reasons, the world cannot ignore the global, much less excessive regional expansion of such an ideology. This is where faux-communist doctrine works for Xi Jinping: wherever Beijing controls the “proletariat” the idea of quiet communist revolution based on resentment of the freedom of private ownership championed by free nations will allow China to extend unipolar imperial ownership and control.


    This begs a question about Russia’s and China’s early 1990’s global diplomatic and information warfare regarding the West and the United States in particular as a “unipolar” power in the world, a misnomer adopted in international affairs literature because it was not then clear that Russia and China were planning to reassert their autocratic, imperial pasts in the 21st Century. Nor was it clear in 1991 they would sell it by using the U.S. influence windfall from aiding both China and Russia in WW2, the USSR’s collapse some 50 years later, and the U.S. response to 9-11-01 as excuses for doing so.


    The massive, implied, and mind-boggling conspiracy theory of the Xi-Putin lie used to assert influence over members of the BRICS, OPEC, and SCO is that the United States planned all of this to become a global hegemon: Hitler’s rise, the Japanese Empire’s bombing of Pearl Harbor, WW2, and to fight across two hemispheric fronts in Pacific and European theaters against the Axis powers warring viciously against China and the USSR.


    Nor do Beijing or Moscow emphasize to their would-be vassal states that Stalin did not oppose Japan’s empire, worsening risk to the United States as it fought on two global fronts for its survival. Nor do they tell their own people or international “partners” that the U.K. and U.S. aided the Russians despite Stalin with a substantial Lend Lease program and by taking on Hitler in Africa and Europe; nor that the U.S. and U.K. aided China in its liberation from the imperial Japanese.


    The value of the truth must be pressed in a global diplomatic offensive to thwart the stunning lies implied, expressed, and by omission used by Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin. This must happen at the highest political levels (the Bully Pulpit and U.S. diplomacy) and across the internet using a trove of archival photographs and primary source documents illustrating the facts of the U.S. roles, challenges, and hard choices of WW2, the Cold War, and the post-war institutions favoring freedom over genocidal tendencies of dictatorships and autocracies.

  • The Red Balloon: PRC Research Survey Ship Role?

    The Red Balloon: PRC Research Survey Ship Role?

    Early morning February 12th, Japan’s Defense Ministry protested a Chinese PLAN survey vessel potentially violating Japan’s territorial waters, with Asahi Shimbun reporting seven such incidents since 2021.

     

    As of 2020, China’s research vessel fleet was the largest of research fleets in the Pacific according to CSIS’s Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative (AMTI), whose interactive map is instructive. A Chinese website “China Dialogue Ocean” (.net) in 2020 represented a Chinese fleet of “60 marine research vessels.” See the snapshot of the AMTI map below with green dots representing China’s then research vessels in the Pacific, with the interactive at this link much more useful to look at:

     

     

    AMTI’s 2019-2020 report noted that “research vessel” and “survey vessel” imply “three types of activity: marine scientific research, naval surveillance, and commercial surveys..” Yet reportedly, the PRC (People’s Republic of China) has been blurring civilian and military research fleet activity. The survey ship, Xiang Yang Hong 03 was intercepted by Indonesian Coast Guard in early January 2021 while “running dark” and using “uncrewed underwater vehicles (UUVs)” in Indonesian territorial waters in violation of UNCLOS, according to USNI. This likely fed into Japanese concerns about the survey ship off the Southern tip of Kyushu on the 12th.

    Could the PRC’s research and survey vessel activities include launching surveillance balloons such as the very large Chinese high altitude balloon tracked by the U.S. Defense Department that sailed on the jet stream over the United States until it was shot down over U.S. territorial waters off the coast of South Carolina? China had initially called it a weather research “airship” that strayed off course, but the U.S. Defense Department has called it an intelligence surveillance balloon that looked different from such as the very large weather aerostat publicized by the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2019 and other weather airships.

    The 2014 Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology illustrated the launch of a large atmospheric study balloon from the Japanese research vessel Hakuho Maru for the purposes of stratospheric air sampling. See graphic from that article below:

     

     

    As for defense applications of high altitude balloons Adam Kehoe at The Drive (Warzone) reported in May 2021 on Raven Aerostar’s work in this area, focusing on U.S. coastal security and possible drone detection. That work raises a question. Might such balloon capabilities be used to help NORAD detect and defend against future adversarial balloons and objects offset from the CONUS? Will China’s boldness help Congress meaningfully fund such projects? Now might be a good time to look into it.